Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 10:10

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
U.S. stock futures dip ahead of renewed trade talks with China - MarketWatch
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Xbox Game Pass adds The Alters today - TrueAchievements
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Wild card Boisson stuns Pegula - Roland Garros
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
What do people usually do when they wake up at 5:00 am?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Is it ok for someone to crossdress in public?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Tender Moment Nurse Mare Adopts Orphaned Foal As Her Own Has Us in Tears - Yahoo
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Delete Every App On Your Smartphone That’s On This List - Forbes